Comments on: Is SVN really atomic? http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/ Its all about Ruby On Rails Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:06:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Akhil Bansal http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-377 Akhil Bansal Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:02:03 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-377 Myron, I have deleted that project, so I can't do that now. But I am sure, those files were in svn. Myron,

I have deleted that project, so I can’t do that now. But I am sure, those files were in svn.

]]> By: Myron A. Semack http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-376 Myron A. Semack Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:09:14 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-376 Were the files actually in the repository? Could you do an 'svn ls URL' and see them? The commit may have succeeded, but the working copy revision bump may have failed. Were the files actually in the repository? Could you do an ’svn ls URL’ and see them?

The commit may have succeeded, but the working copy revision bump may have failed.

]]> By: Akhil Bansal http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-375 Akhil Bansal Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:11:52 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-375 Myron, I did the fresh checkout,when commit failed and found some of those files physically there. so what could the cleanup do? Myron,

I did the fresh checkout,when commit failed and found some of those files physically there.

so what could the cleanup do?

]]> By: Myron A. Semack http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-374 Myron A. Semack Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:00:23 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-374 Repository commits are atomic. However, it is possible for the working copy to get screwed up (local filesystem operations are not atomic). Run 'svn cleanup' in your working copy. Repository commits are atomic. However, it is possible for the working copy to get screwed up (local filesystem operations are not atomic). Run ’svn cleanup’ in your working copy.

]]> By: gaurav http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-373 gaurav Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:31 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-373 i faced this today i faced this today

]]> By: stephen sykes http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-372 stephen sykes Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:37:25 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-372 Yes, svn can get into a mess. Does the error message look anything like "svn: Working copy path '...' does not exist in repository"? See here http://www.stephensykes.com/blog_perm.html?135 Yes, svn can get into a mess.

Does the error message look anything like “svn: Working copy path ‘…’ does not exist in repository”? See here

http://www.stephensykes.com/blog_perm.html?135

]]> By: Seth Ladd http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-371 Seth Ladd Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:56:45 +0000 http://webonrails.com/2007/07/09/is-svn-really-atomic/#comment-371 Yes, this has happened to me. Weird. Yes, this has happened to me. Weird.

]]>